|
|
pts
|
|
pts
|
|
pts
|
|
|
School
Setting
|
5
|
School setting
is well-described.
|
3
|
School setting
is description is adequate but not complete.
|
1
|
School setting
description is vague.
|
|
The
Use of Technology to Support Curriculum
|
15
|
Use of technology
is described/shown in a way that fully explains the implementation.
Specific instances of use are identified.
|
10
|
Use of technology
is described/shown in a way that explains the implementation.
No specific instances of use are identified.
|
5
|
Use of technology
description is vague. No specific instances are identified.
|
|
Standards
|
5
|
Specific
standards and source of those standards are described
|
3
|
Specific
standards are too general but source of standards are described.
|
1
|
Specific
standards are too general and source of standards is ignored.
|
|
Differences
in Student Learning
|
5
|
Differences
in student learning are described well along with specific instance.
|
3
|
Differences
in student learning are described but no specific instances
are identified.
|
1
|
Differences
in Student Learning are only vaguely mentioned.
|
|
Support
Issues
|
5
|
Support
issues are completely described along with specific instances.
|
3
|
Support
issues are described but no specific instances are identified.
|
1
|
Support
issues descriptions are vague.
|
|
Future
Visions
|
5
|
Future visions
of the educator are fully described. If the educator doesn't
have any visions, the presenter can make his/her own predictions.
|
3
|
Future visions
are adequate but not well considered.
|
1
|
Future visions
are vague.
|
|
Quality
of Presentation
|
10
|
Presentation
was well-organized and well- presented. No misspellings were
evident.
|
7
|
Presentation
had some organization but presentation was choppy. 3 or less
misspellings were evident.
|
4
|
Presentation
had little organization. More than 3 misspellings were evident.
|