
You have had the opportunity to evaluate three software packages as individuals. Now it is time for you to convene and share your evaluations. These evaluations will function as the basis of discussion between you, the group members, and will hopefully begin a joint agreement of what you find most important in quality software. This assignments asks you (the team) to produce a collaborative paper that explains your teams quality standards based upon similarities and differences of your groups reviews. (1-2 pgs). This is not supposed to be a complex paper, but it must be insightful. Use the following writing prompts to help you with your writing: ---What software did you evaluate?---What similarities did you find in your evaluations? (Explain this for each software package.) ---What differences did you find in your evaluations? (Explain this for each software package.) ---Based upon the similarities and differences you found in your evaluations, what standards do you, as a team, feel must be upheld in creating good software? |
| CATEGORY |
6 |
5 |
4 |
3 |
2 |
| Software Identified? | All three software packages are identified. | Two software packages are identified. | |||
| Similarities Explained | Similarities are
identified for all 3 packages. |
Similarities are not discussed for individual packages, but discussed well. | Similarities are identified for all 3 packages. Discussion is vague. | Similarities are not discussed for individual packages and discussion is vague. | |
| Differences Explained |
Differences are identified for all 3 packages. Discussion is well-described. |
Similarities are not discussed for individual packages, but discussed well. |
Similarities are identified for all 3 packages. Discussion is vague. |
Similarities are not discussed for individual packages and discussion is vague. |
|
| Standards Described |
Standards
are well identified. Explanation of standards identification is based
upon earlier explanations. |
Standards are well identified but little connection is given for connection to earlier explanations. |
Standards are well identified but not connection is given to earlier explanations. |
**Spelling and/or grammar errors in your project (over 2) will cost 1 point each.
This page was last updated by Dr.
Z on
3/3/03