| CRITERIA |
|
Exemplary
| |
Proficient
| |
Partially Proficient
| |
Incomplete
|
POINTS |
| Opening Page |
5 |
Opening page is interesting and exhibits a good layout. |
4 |
Opening page is somewhat interesting and layout is ok |
3 |
Opening page is dull and layout is confusing. |
2 |
Opening page is fraught with problems. |
|
| Educational Philosophy |
10 |
Philosophy is written in a smooth, flowing manner. It includes personal comments about learning and teaching. No problems with grammar and/or spelling. |
8 |
Philosophy is written in a choppy, stilted format. It includes personal comments about learning or teaching but not both. A few problems exist with grammar and/or spelling. |
6 |
Philosophy is difficult to understand. The comments have little to do with personal feelings about learning or teaching. Some problems exist with grammar and/or spelling. |
4 |
Philosophy is difficult to understand and has multiple problems with grammar and spelling |
|
| Standards Overview |
5 |
All artifacts and work samples are clearly and directly related to one or more state teaching standards/criteria and provide evidence of professional practice. |
4 |
Most artifacts and work samples are related to one or more state teaching standards/criteria and provide evidence of professional practice.
|
3 |
Few artifacts and work samples are related to one or more state teaching standards/criteria . |
2 |
Most artifacts and work samples are unrelated to one or more state teaching standards/criteria. |
|
| Standards Pages |
40 |
Each page has a list of artifacts that fulfill each criteria. A description for each artifact if also provided. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Artifacts/Standards Matrix |
10 |
Lists minimum of 10 artifacts.
Identifies standards that each artifact fulfills.
Each artifact name is linked to that artifact's page.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Artifacts Pages
(at least 10) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Reflections
(3 pts. for each of 10 Artifacts) |
40 |
Reflections are well-written, informative, and use the "What, So What, Now What" format. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Standards/Criteria Connections
(2 pts. for each of 10 Artifacts) |
20 |
Specifically identify all of the criteria that are addressed by each artifact and explains how they are addressed. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
Artifact
(2 pts. for each of 10 Artifacts) |
20 |
Actual artifact(s) is placed on the page or linked to from the page. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Burned on CD |
10 |
Saved on CD.
Name is descriptive
8 characters or less.
Disk is labeled with Title, Date, and Student Name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ease of Navigation (CD) |
10 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the e-portfolio.
All of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
All internal links work.
All external links work.
|
8 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the 90 - 99% of the e-portfolio.
90 - 99% of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
90 - 99% of the internal links work.
90 - 99% of the external links work.
|
6 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the 80 - 89% of the e-portfolio.
80 - 89% of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
80 - 89% of the internal links work.
80 - 89% of the external links work. |
4 |
There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) do not connect back to the main table of contents or preceding pages or to the original index page.
Many internal and external links to connecting websites do not connect. |
|
| Posted on Web |
10 |
Posted on the Web.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Ease of Navigation (Web) |
10 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the e-portfolio.
All of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
All internal links work.
All external links work.
|
8 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the 90 - 99% of the e-portfolio.
90 - 99% of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
90 - 99% of the internal links work.
90 - 99% of the external links work.
|
6 |
Navigation is easily understood and consistent throughout the 80 - 89% of the e-portfolio.
80 - 89% of the portfolio navigation links and all sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) are accessible by connecting back to the main table of contents or a consistent navigation bar throughout the e-portfolio.
80 - 89% of the internal links work.
80 - 89% of the external links work. |
4 |
There are significant problems with portfolio navigation links and many sections (standards, artifacts, and reflections) do not connect back to the main table of contents or preceding pages or to the original index page.
Many internal and external links to connecting websites do not connect. |
|
| Overall Quality |
10 |
Exceptional quality of e-portfolio.
|
8 |
Good quality of e-portfolio.
|
6 |
Fair quality of e-portfolio.
|
4 |
Poor quality of e-portfolio. |
|
TOTAL POINTS (200 Possible) | |