|
Module
6
Ethics
Introduction
Readings
Videos
Activities
Evaluation
Other
Modules
|
Module
6
Ethics, Evaluation
This rubric may be used for self-assessment. Your
grade will be based upon the following criteria:
Exemplary
Discussion Contributions
- Active,
timely participation in class discussions that incorporated
a clear understanding of course readings.
- Postings were completed before the deadline.
- Contributions addressed all questions asked.
- Responses were concise yet thorough.
- Responses to classmates' postings enhanced the class discussion
with additional insights, questions, observations, or suggestions.
- When appropriate, responded constructively to others'
ideas.
- Video analyses postings addressed salient points of the
topic in relation to the video.
- Response to classmates' analysis further expanded the
topic of analysis.
Collaborative Activity
- Fully participated in collaborative activity.
- Contributed ideas and responded to the ideas of teammates.
- Submitted assignment before the deadline.
- Responded to teammates in a timely manner.
Lesson Plan
- Completed a thorough critique of a classmate's Lesson
Plan, demonstrating a clear understanding of the elements
of a good Lesson Plan.
- Identified major strengths and weaknesses in a constructive,
helpful manner.
- Spelling, grammar, and presentation are error free.
- Submitted the assignment before the deadline.
Reflection
- All questions answered with insightful explorations of
the topics.
- Writing was concise yet revealing extensive thought about
the topic.
- Deep understanding of the topic was evident.
- Additional questions, problems, or ideas were raised.
Proficient
Discussion Contributions
- Postings were completed before the deadline and answered
nearly all questions.
- Responses were nearly concise and/or complete.
- Responses to classmates' postings did not enhance the
class discussion, but did address the issues in the posting.
- Video analyses postings addressed the basic points of
the topic in relation to the video.
- Response to classmates' analysis did not further expand
the topic of analysis.
Collaborative Activity
- Participated in collaborative activity.
- Contributed some ideas and responded to the ideas of teammates.
- Responded to teammates in a timely manner.
- Submitted assignment by the deadline.
Lesson Plan
- Completed a thorough critique of a classmate's Lesson
Plan, demonstrating a clear understanding of the elements
of a good Lesson Plan.
- Identified strengths and weaknesses in a constructive,
helpful manner.
- Spelling, grammar, and presentation are error free.
- Submitted the assignment before the deadline.
Reflection
- Most questions answered quite thoroughly.
- Writing indicates more stream of consciousness than carefully
thought out ideas.
- Understanding of the topic is evident.
Partially Proficient
Discussion Contributions
- Some postings not completed by deadline.
- Postings were too trivial to fully meet the requirement.
For example, most of the postings were "I think
so too" or "I disagree", but lacked any argument that added
to the discussion; there was excessive quoting from the
material without any real supporting evidence of how the
topic might integrate with their classroom teaching.
Collaborative Activity
- Participated in collaborative activity.
- Contributed minimal ideas and/or responded superficially
to the ideas of teammates.
- Responded to teammates in a timely manner.
- Submitted assignment by the deadline.
Lesson Plan
- Completed a critique of a classmate's Lesson Plan, demonstrating
a general understanding of the elements of a good Lesson
Plan.
- Identified most strengths and weaknesses in a constructive,
helpful manner.
- Spelling, grammar, and presentation are error free.
- Submitted the assignment before the deadline.
Reflection
- Some questions were answered thoroughly.
- Haphazard approach to answering questions--some gave evidence
of thought and care, while others were answered superficially.
Incomplete
Discussion Contributions
- Most postings not completed by deadline.
- Contributions were merely perfunctory.
For example, most of the postings were "I think
so too" or "I disagree", but lacked any argument that added
to the discussion, or there was excessive quoting from the
material without any real supporting evidence of how the
topic might integrate with their classroom teaching.
Collaborative Activity
- Did not participate in collaborative activity, or
- Contributed ideas without substance and did not respond
to the ideas of teammates.
- Did not respond to teammates in a timely manner.
- Submitted assignment after the deadline.
Lesson Plan
- Completed a critique of a classmate's Lesson Plan, but
did not demonstrate adequate understanding of the elements
of a good Lesson Plan.
- Identified strengths and weaknesses but either was not
constructive or missed obvious points.
- The critique contained spelling, grammar, or presentation
errors.
- Submitted the assignment after the deadline.
Reflection
- Some questions answered.
- Did not demonstrate full understanding of the topic.
Evaluation Scale
A - Exemplary
B - Proficient
Partially Proficient and Incomplete need to be resubmitted
to meet at least the Proficient level. The highest grade possible
for re-submissions will be B.
|
