Instructional Design
 

Home |  Class InfoCalendar | Site Map


Module 5
Instructional Analysis
    Introduction
    Readings
    Videos
    Activities
    Evaluation

Other Modules

Module 5
Instructional Analysis, Evaluation
This rubric may be used for self-assessment. Your grade will be based upon the following criteria:

Exemplary

Discussion Contributions

  • Active, timely participation in class discussions that incorporated a clear understanding of course readings.
  • Postings were completed before the deadline.
  • Contributions addressed all questions asked.
  • Responses were concise yet thorough.
  • Responses to classmates' postings enhanced the class discussion with additional insights, questions, observations, or suggestions.
  • When appropriate, responded constructively to others' ideas.
  • Video analyses postings addressed salient points of the topic in relation to the video.
  • Response to classmates' analysis further expanded the topic of analysis.

Journal Writing

  • All questions answered with insightful explorations of the topics.
  • Writing was concise yet revealing extensive thought of the topic.
  • Deep understanding of the topic was evident.
  • Additional questions, problems, or ideas were raised.

Unit of Instruction

  • Accurately and completely identified cognitive domains.
  • Instructional Analysis is accurate and complete, including substeps.
  • Accurate division of entry behaviors is indicated.
  • Submitted the assignment to the Instructor before the deadline.
  • Responded to the Instructor's suggestions, if any, in a timely manner that indicated careful thought and review.


Proficient

Discussion Contributions

  • Postings were completed before the deadline and answered nearly all questions.
  • Responses were nearly concise and/or complete.
  • Responses to classmates' postings did not enhance the class discussion, but did address the issues in the posting.
  • Video analyses postings addressed the basic points of the topic in relation to the video.
  • Response to classmates' analysis did not further expand the topic of analysis.


Journal Writing

  • Most questions answered quite thoroughly.
  • Writing indicates more stream of consciousness than carefully thought out ideas.
  • Understanding of the topic is evident.


Unit of Instruction

  • Identified cognitive domains.
  • Instructional Analysis is accurate for the major steps, though some substeps are missing.
  • Accurate division of entry behaviors is indicated.
  • Submitted the assignment to the Instructor before the deadline.
  • Responded to the Instructor's suggestions, if any, in a timely manner that indicated careful thought and review.

Partially Proficient

Discussion Contributions

  • Some postings not completed by deadline.
  • Postings were too few in number, or too trivial to fully meet the requirement.
  • For example, most of the postings were "I think so too" or "I disagree", but lacked any argument that added to the discussion; there was excessive quoting from the material without any real supporting evidence of how the topic might integrate with their classroom teaching.

Journal Writing

  • Some questions were answered thoroughly.
  • Haphazard approach to answering questions--some gave evidence of thought and care, while others were answered superficially.

Unit of Instruction

  • Some cognitive domains identification errors.
  • Instructional Analysis is mostly accurate for the major steps.
  • Division of entry behaviors is indicated.
  • Submitted the assignment to the Instructor before the deadline.
  • Responded to the Instructor's suggestions, if any, in a timely manner that indicated careful thought and review.

Incomplete

Discussion Contributions

  • Most postings not completed by deadline.
  • Contributions were merely perfunctory.
  • For example, most of the postings were "I think so too" or "I disagree", but lacked any argument that added to the discussion, or there was excessive quoting from the material without any real supporting evidence of how the topic might integrate with their classroom teaching.

Journal Writing

  • Some questions answered.
  • Did not demonstrate full understanding of the topic.

Unit of Instruction

  • Cognitive domains identification errors.
  • Instructional Analysis is mostly inaccurate.
  • Division of entry behaviors is inaccurate.
  • Submitted the assignment to the Instructor after the deadline.
  • Did not respond to the Instructor's suggestions for improvement.

Evaluation Scale

A - Exemplary

B - Proficient

Partially Proficient and Incomplete need to be resubmitted to meet at least the Proficient level. The highest grade possible for re-submissions will be B.

 

Home |  Class InfoCalendar | Site Map |  Top

© COPYRIGHT 2001-2003
Jacky Abromitis
All Rights Reserved.

Last Updated: