2013 UNI Symposium Evaluation

Please complete the following evaluation of Scholarship Matters: 2013 UNI Symposium on Research and Creative Activity. We value your input and appreciate your time.

Please rate your overall satisfaction with each symposium component:

	1 - poor	2 - fair	3 - good	4 - very good	5 - excellent	6 - did not attend
Registration
Keynote Panel
Poster & Performance
Lunch
On-line Breakout Session - Defining Scholarship (Laura Cruz and Andrew Adams)
On-line Breakout Session - The Teacher Scholar Model (Windy Gordon)
On-line Breakout Session - Assessing Scholarship (Robert Crow)
On-line Breakout Session - Minding Your P's and Q's (Hollye Moss)
On-line Wrap-Up Discussion
Location & Facilities (Maucker Union)
Overall evaluation of the Symposium

Overall, what did you like best about the conference?:

In what ways could the conference have been improved?:

Do you have suggestions for ways our campus community could build on the symposium, for example, next steps to take, follow-up activities or continuing discussion?:

Do you have any suggestions for future conferences like this one, for example topics to include or omit?:

Office of Research and Sponsored Programs

Quick Links

2013 UNI Symposium Evaluation