COMM 4446/5446:01 Social Protest: Performance and Rhetorical
Fall 2011 2:00PM 03:15pm Tu/Th
- Instructor: Catherine H. Palczewski, Ph.D. Office: Lang Hall 341
- Office hours:
- Tues: 11:00am - 12:30pm, 5:00pm-6:00pm
- Weds: 11:00am - 12:00pm
- Thurs: 11:00am - 12:00pm
- If these times do not
work, feel free to call or email to make an appointment.
- Office Phone: 273-2714 Mailbox: Lang Hall 326 e-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
This syllabus would not be possible without the assistance of Karen Mitchell, who also teaches this course at UNI. Faculty at UNI and other universities also have shared their ideas, assignments and syllabi, and I thank them for their help: Leah White, Jennifer Potter, Dan Brouwer, and Valeria Fabj. This syllabus is better because of them.
Description: As sociologist James M. Jasper explains in The Art of Moral Protest (1997), "No matter who the audience, protest groups appeal to it through rhetorical framing. They try to define issues, appeal to underlying values, link to positive and negative affects and symbols, spread new information and points of view. Not all their messages are purveyed by words. Actions and the choice of tactics send all sorts of signals; they tell an outsider as much about a group as its explicit arguments do. Cultural persuasion also takes place through organizational forms which are themselves a form of tactic" (p. 242).
This course will introduce you to roles rhetoric and performance play in social protest, whether in the form of social movements, as generated by counter-public spheres, or as embodied and enacted by individuals. Pedagogically, the class will be structured around a discussion format. Occasional lectures will be presented, but it will always be the students' responsibility to complete the assigned readings prior to class. "Complete" means that you will be able to answer direct questions about the readings and their applications quickly and thoroughly. This means that you should take notes as you read.
- Achieve a comprehensive understanding of theories of the rhetoric and performance of social protest, counterpublic spheres, and social controversy.
- Construct a theory of social change as it relates to social protest.
- Understand the limits and possibilities of how individuals, through rhetoric and performance, can effect social change. In other words, come to understand that institutionalized political action is not the only way to move the social.
- Improve discussion skills.
- Complete a study of an act of social protest, employing primary sources in order to develop one's writing and analytical abilities.
- RRSP: Morris III, Charles E. and Stephen H. Browne, eds. Readings on the Rhetoric of Social Protest. 2nd ed. State College, PA: Strata, 2006.
- RRP: Gencarella, Stephen Olbrys and Phaedra C. Pezzullo, eds. Readings on Rhetoric and Performance. State College, PA: Strata, 2010.
General Information: see this link. This site includes my late policy, the university accommodation policy, as well as paper format descriptions.
Student Etiquette: Lively debate, discussion, and disagreement on issues are encouraged in class. But respect for other people, their opinions, and experiences is essential. The most productive way to disagree with another is to say, “I disagree with you because…” and explain and justify your position. Although everyone is entitled to her/his opinion, the reality is that some opinions are better supported and more reasonable than other opinions; thus, be able to explain why you hold the opinion you do and why you think your opinion is better supported than another’s. Engage each other in a reasoned exchange of ideas. In other words, present an argument (a claim supported by data, with reasons/warrants as to why that data is relevant to the claim).
Throughout the semester we will encounter a variety of challenging issues relating to gender, sexuality, race, class, etc. The content of this class has the potential to stir up strong emotional reactions. You will encounter ideas and theories that challenge you. Students are asked to follow some guidelines to help maintain a constructive learning environment. Participants in this class must be open to looking at a variety of perspectives. Further, it is possible that films, readings, images, music, etc. used in this class may be considered “offensive” by some. A student’s decision to stay enrolled in the class is an agreement to approach all course content with a critical academic lens. Above all, participants must treat each other with respect. The most fundamental way to respect class participants is to complete daily readings, listen to others, and ground your own comments in principles of critical thinking. Class discussions should take place within the context of academic inquiry and in the spirit of understanding diverse perspectives and experiences. Do not engage in private conversations, interrupt another student who has the floor, keep pagers and cell phones on, or show general signs of disrespect for the course, professor, or other students. Non-course related materials such as newspapers and items from other courses must be stowed away when class begins.
|1A. Paper 1 (intro paper)
||September 20 (rough draft due September 13)
|1B. Paper 2 (initial analysis)
||November 1 (rough draft due October 25)
|1C. Paper 3 (Final paper)
||December 6 (in class peer editing of rough drafts to occur November 15 and 17)
|2. Presentation of final paper
||December 6 and 8
||every class session
|5. Peer editing
||due September 15, October 27, November 15 and 17
|6. Final exam
||1-2:50 p.m. Wednesday, December 14
Assignments are worth a total of 100 points. However, for each assignment you can earn fractions of points (so, you can think of it as a 1000 point scale if it makes you feel better). If you need to figure your letter grade at any point in the semester, simply divide the number of points you have by the number of possible points you could have earned. For your final grade, simply add up all the points for each assignment. Points are noted in brackets. The individual point value of each assignment is noted in brackets [ ] immediately following the assignment title. Simply doing the base requirements of each assignment will earn you a "C" -- this means you have done acceptable work. To earn a "B" you must go beyond the assignment expectations or fulfill them in an above average way. To earn an "A" you must go far beyond the assignment expectations and fulfill the base expectations in an exceptional manner.
Detailed descriptions of all assignments appear on this syllabus. You are free to ask questions in class about the assignments, or contact me outside of class by email or phone. But, please be aware, I will NOT answer any questions about an assignment past the class session before it is due (most assignments are due on Tuesday, which means you have until the Thursday before it is due to ask questions). I recognize that students procrastinate, so, consider this an inducement to begin work early. This means if you have a question, you need to be prepared to ask it in the class session before the paper is due. I will not answer questions after that time.
Your paper will focus on analyzing a rhetorical or performative action in an act of social protest.
Assignments center around a progressive paper in three steps -- meaning, the first paper becomes the introduction for the 2nd, the 2nd becomes the intro and first section of the 3rd. You will need to learn appropriate citation format (APA or MLA), and will be expected to revise and edit your work as the paper progresses.
Even though there is an extensive peer review process built into the class, you still are expected to conscientiously proofread your own work. If a paper has numerous typographical, citation, or grammatical errors, I will return it ungraded and the late clock will start ticking.
Page limits on all assignments will be rigorously enforced. You should spend time finding ways to write more concisely and clearly. If I find your paper long-winded, and you go over the page limit, I will quit reading. (If however, you are brilliant and keep me captivated, I may not notice). Given the expectations of each of the assignments, you probably will need to use the number of pages required. If, however, you are exceptionally concise, then I may not notice if your paper falls short of the recommended page length.
A bibliography should be turned in with every assignment. It will not count toward your page limit. On the top of the page, indicate the style (APA or MLA) that you think you are using.
The content of the paper should be a detailed analysis of a single social protest text (a speech, performance, song, artwork, play, rally, march, flier, etc.). Students must pick a text from a movement about which extensive research already has been published. For example, if you were analyzing protest in the abortion controversy you would use Celeste Condit's Decoding Abortion Rhetoric (1994), environmental rhetoric -- Kevin DeLuca's Image Politics (1999), MADD -- Joseph Gusfield's Contested Meanings (1996), woman suffrage -- Karlyn Kohrs Campbell's Man Cannot Speak For Her (1989), African American civil rights -- Condit and Lucaites' Crafting Equality (1993), etc. In other words, I am not asking you to do a complete study of a social movement or rhetorical campaign. Instead, I want you to find others' studies that can provide a larger framework for your study of a specific text. You must pick a text for which a scholarly study of the broader protest context (movement, campaign, controversy, counterpublic) has already been written. Your first paper must identify the main scholarly source you will be using for general information. For a list of essays about labor, civil rights, feminism, etc., see this link. The link does not provide an exhaustive list, but is just meant to give you an idea of the range of scholarship available. Regardless of from which movement you select a text, to find studies of the larger movement you should (at a minimum) conduct an exhaustive search of:
- Communication & Mass Media Complete,
- Project Muse,
- Lexis/Nexis law reviews, and
In particular, you should look for research from the Communication Studies discipline. Examples can be found at this link.
FOR ALL PAPERS, TURN IN THE PEER EDITED DRAFTS WHEN YOU TURN IN THE PAPER. YOUR PAPER WILL NOT BE CONSIDERED "TURNED IN" UNTIL ALL PEER EDITED DRAFTS ARE TURNED IN.
A. Paper 1: [10 points] (5 pages) Due September 20 (draft due September 13) This paper eventually will serve as the introduction to the final 15 page paper. PLEASE ATTACH A COPY OF THE PROTEST TEXT BEING STUDIED.
This paper should (not in any partiuclar order . . . this is NOT an outline for the paper):
- provide a general introduction to the larger social movement, citing relevant research on the movement,
- identify the theoretical framework that will guide your analysis (rhetorical movement, counterpublic, controversy, confrontation, etc.),
- introduce the reader to the text you will analyze by including a general summary of the text that identifies its main thesis, outlines its structure, and highlights its substantive and stylistic elements (this should take at least 2 paragraphs), and
- locate the text's role/function within the larger social protest.
For the bibliography, (which is worth 5 points) I want the following:
A. printouts of the various searches you did in each of the above listed data bases. This means, at a minimum, there should be printouts of 6 searches. However, for most every database, you will want to use multiple search terms.
B. Works cited/references, which includes:
- Actual works cited or references for the paper.
- Additional sample citations. I want to make sure everyone knows how to do citations forms for typical sources. In addition to the sources you actually use, you need to include bibliographic entries for at least one of each of the following (even if you are not citing it yet):
Remember to turn in peer edits along with this paper. This paper will not be considered turned in until all the peer edits of your papers have been turned in as well.
- book chapter
- newspaper article
- magazine article
- scholarly journal article
- web source
B. Paper 2 [15 points] (10 pages) Due November 1 (rough draft due October 25) The intro to the paper should incorporate a revised version of your first paper (2-3 pages, taken from the first paper). The first section (2-3 pages, taken from the first paper and developed) should provide a rich description of the larger movement. The second section (2-3 pages, all new) should review relevant theories from the readings that will be applied to your analysis of the text. The third section (3-4 pages, new) should outline your initial analysis of the text you are studying. This last section should identify the type of tactic the text uses (i.e. direct, indirect, performance, confrontational, nondiscursive, discursive, controversy, etc.) REMEMBER TO INCLUDE A THEORETICAL FRAME FOR THE PAPER: CONFRONTRATION, CONTROVERSY, SOCIAL MOVEMENT OR COUNTERPUBLIC SPHERE. Also, remember to include a works cited/references.
So, the outline should look something like this:
<Introduction> (2-3 pages)
I. Rich description of the movement from which the text is taken (2-3 pages), locating the text in a specific period of the movement (inception, crisis, consummation if relevent)
II. Theoretical framework used to analyze the text (2-3 pages)
III. Initial analysis of text (2-4 pages)
Remember to turn in peer edits along with this paper. This paper will not be considered turned in until all the peer edits of your papers have been turned in as well.
C. Final paper: [20 points] (15 pages) Due December 6 The final paper should incorporate and refine all the sections from the second paper. Additions are likely to happen in the second section. Additions are expected in the third section. A new fourth section may also be developed. The focus of this paper is on refining your detailed analysis and advancing interesting and innovative critical arguments about how the text functioned as a form of social protest. Also, remember to include a works cited/references. Remember to turn in peer edits along with this paper. This paper will not be considered turned in until all the peer edits of your papers have been turned in as well.
2. Presentation of final paper: [10 points] Due December 6 and 8 During the last week of class, students will present their final papers. Depending on the number of students in the class, presentation lengths will vary, thus final details will be posted once class begins. Students are expected to speak from an outline, a copy of which they should turn in prior to the presentation. The information provided in the final presentations will form the bulk of the content expected to be covered in the final exam.
The presentation should outline the core argument made in the paper. You should also provide evidence (quotations from the readings or text, for example) to support the main argument.
More helpful hints:
A) Do NOT simply read your paper for your presentation. The presentation should be formal and professional, but not scripted. I suggest you speak from a detailed outline (remember to include quotations from the readings in the outline to illustrate the points you want to make). Please bring two copies of the outline: one to speak from and one for me. DO practice the presentation to make sure your outline fits within the time limits. Time limits will be enforced, strictly.
B) Presume the audience is not familiar with your paper, but is educated about social protest. Thus, your presentation should include a detailed description of the specific act of protest and a less detailed reference to theories of protest. Your presentation does NOT need to include detailed definitions of common protest theory terms (i.e. confrontational rhetoric), but you might want to provide quick reminders of what extremely precise technical terms mean (i.e. oppositional argument). Do provide sufficient theoretical explanation of more complicated concepts so that the audience can follow your analysis.
C) Do not try to present all the arguments in your paper. You will not be able to cover everything in just a few minutes. Instead, give a brief overview of all your arguments, and then pick one or two on which to focus the presentation.
D) Think about answering the "so what?" question and think about what you want your audience to take away from the presentation. What really cool thing did you figure out as part of this class?
3. Midterm: [10 points] October 20.
4. Discussion: [15 points] Being a good participant does not mean that you always have the answer; it can also mean that you know when to ask the right questions and when to recognize that the answers have already been offered by the class but need to be synthesized. Discussion is a central component of this class insofar as each person's analysis of the text can be enhanced by others' insights. For a detailed description of the criteria used in the assessment of discussion, see my discussion link.
In order to be a full participant in discussion, you MUST have completed the assigned reading. I will open every class asking if there are questions, but beyond that, I will not review the readings. Instead, I will assume you have completed the reading, taken notes, and are ready to apply and analyze the readings. AnaLouise Keating (Teaching Transformation, 2007, p. 196) provides the following description of good academic practices in regards to reading for class:
- I expect you to complete all readings by the date listed on the syllabus;
- I expect you to read the material thoughtfully and in an engaged manner;
- I expect you to read all endnotes and footnotes;
- I expect you to read (not skim) all of the required readings--even those you find "boring" or difficult;
- I expect you to reread those texts that you have previously read
- I expect you to seek out definitions for words and terminology you don't know . . . try the following websites:
- http://www.cios.org/ [added by Cate]
For those who are uncertain about their
ability to participate consistently, I suggest you do the following. For each week, I would like you to prepare a discussion log,
no more than 1 single space typed page for each half, due the next
class period. The log should have 2 halves:
A. Pre-class: a description of how you prepared to
contribute to discussion (key concepts outlined, examples
developed, questions formulated.);
B. Post-class: A self-assessment of your contribution to class
using the five elements outlined in the discussion link. You
should attach a grade to your participation for the class period
5. Peer editing [10 points]
September 13: Bring two (2) copies of a draft of paper one to class. You will trade papers with two others. Edited papers should be returned to their authors on September 15 .
October 25: Bring two (2) copies of a draft of paper two to class. You will trade papers with two others. Edited papers should be returned to their authors on October 27.
November 15 and 17: Bring two (2) copies of a draft of your final paper to class. In class peer editing will occur. Return your paper to the author at the end of the class sessions.
Remember to sign your name to any paper you edit. Authors, please remember to turn in the edited version when you turn in your paper. Authors, your papers will not be considered turned in until you have turned in all the edits.
Editing guidelines: In order to receive the minimum passing credit for editing, you are expected to provide the following each time you edit:
1. Substantive edits: You are expected to provide a minimum of three (3) substantive suggestions. In order to make a good substantive suggestion, it usually requires at least a paragraph of writing. Given the length of these edits, you may want to type them. These suggestions can include:
- Additional arguments to be made. You can point to additional evidence that supports their argument, or that modifies their argument in some way.
- Additional citation on the history of the topic. You can provide the citation for a relevant essay or book, and explain the contribution it makes.
- Additional variables or concepts that develop the thesis/research questions. You can provide a quotation and page number from the class texts, and explain what is revealed by using the concepts from the texts.
- Additional scholarly citations. You can provide citations for articles from scholarly journals and books. You should summarize the concept from the scholar, and then explain it.
- Major organizational changes. You can suggest a major reordering of the paper. This is more than moving the order of two paragraphs. Instead, it would constitute an alternative way to develop the argument.
- Major differences in interpretation. You may disagree with some interpretive move the author makes. If so, make a case for an alternative interpretation, providing evidence.
2. Stylistic edits: You are expected to make a minimum of ten (10) style edits. They can include:
- bibliographic citation corrections
- internal citation corrections
- typographical error corrections
- grammar corrections
- spelling corrections
- sentence rewordings
6. Final [10 points]1-2:50 p.m. Wednesday, December 14. The final will be in essay form, and will ask you to develop a theory of social protest. The theory should be derived not only from the acts of social protest discussed in class readings, but also from the acts of protest studied by other class members.
Graduate students: You will develop an individual assignment track that best fits your interests and needs, pending approval from me. You should write up a description of the assignments you choose to do, their due dates, and their point values and hand it in by August 30 (use this syllabus as a model for the format and level of detail expected). The assignment track is up to you, save for two parts: 1) papers and 2) weekly meetings. The papers: you must write a 20-25 page progressive paper with due dates corresponding to the due dates for the undergraduate papers. Your papers need not focus on a text, but can be a broader analysis of a movement. The point values for the papers are up to you. The meeting: graduate students also are expected to meet, as a group, with the professor outside of class for one hour weekly. We will compare schedules once class starts to find a time that works for everyone. Expect the meetings to start in the third week of classes. Meetings will be ******.
Syllabus: (This syllabus is subject to change, although that rarely happens.) If changes happen, they will be in hot pink. The bibliographic form used in the syllabus is MLA. Readings are from the assigned texts or contain links to electronic versions unless otherwise noted.
|1: August 23, 25: Introduction to the Performance and Rhetoric of Social Protest
Tu: RRSP: pp. 1-9 (Intro), 35-44 (Simons); RRP: pp 1-11
Th: RRSP: pp. 9-13 (Griffin), 472-485 (Condit); RRP pp. 15-21 (Conquergood)
GRAD: Orenstein, Claudia. "Agitational Performance, Now and Then." Theater 31.3 (Fall 2001): 139-151.
||rhetoric, performance, social protest, enactment, instrumental rhetoric, consummatory rhetoric, social movement, dramatism, inception/crisis/consummation, ideograph, praxis, body politics, social drama, liminal, publics, public culture
|2: August 30, September 1: Social Protest as Confrontation and Ego-Function
Tu: RRSP: pp. 28-34 (Scott & Smith), pp. 320-334 (Dow)
Th: RRSP: pp. 45-57 (Gregg), pp. 288-303 (Lake)
||confrontation (in all its various definitions), ego-function, genuine argument, empowerment, consummatory rhetoric, ritual, time's cycle v. time's arrow, strategic/communicative/expressive/instrumental action
|3: September 6, 8: Social Protest as Counterpublics
Tu: Fraser, Nancy. "Rethinking the Public Sphere." Habermas and the Public Sphere. Ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. 109-142. on eLearning; and Brouwer, Daniel. "Communication as . . . Counterpublic." Communication as . . . Ed. Gregory Shepherd, Jeffrey St. John, and Ted Striphas. Thousand Oaks: Sage, 2006. on eLearning
Th: RRSP: pp. 266-286 (Pezzullo) or RRP pp. 319-342 (Pezzullo); RRP pp. 294-318 (Hauser)
||public sphere, state, counterpublic spheres, globalization, new communication technologies, weak v. strong public, performance, image events, pinkwashing, cultural performance, vernacular rhetoric, institutional actors
|4: September 13, 15: Social Protest as Controversy: The Role of Body Politics
Tu: RRSP: pp. 184-209 (Olson & Goodnight)
Th: RRP: pp. 200-214 (Butler), pp. 214-232 (Sloop)
September 13: Bring two (2) copies of a draft of paper one to class. You will trade papers with two others. Edited papers should be returned to their authors on September 15.
|controversy, discursive, non-discursive, oppositional argument, gender, performativity, interability
|5: September 20, 22: Social Protest and Body Argument in Environmentalism
Tu: DeLuca, Kevin Michael. "Unruly Arguments: The Body Rhetoric of EarthFirst!" Argumentation and Advocacy 36 (Summer 1999): 9-21. on eLearning
Th: RRSP: pp. 244-265 (DeLuca & Peeples);
Pezzullo, Phraedra C. "Contextualizing Boycotts and Buycotts: The Impure Politics of Consumer-based Advocacy in an Age of Global Ecological Crises." Communication and Critical/Cultural Studies 8.2 (June 2011): 124-145. on eLearning
|Sept. 20: paper 1 due
|| tactics, public screen, public sphere, re-mediation, distraction, dissemination v. dialogue, role of violence in social protest, image events. impure politics
|6: September 27, 29: Social Protest for Sexual Rights and Against Homophobia
Tu: RRSP: pp. 486-507 (Darsey); Fabj, Valeria and Matthew J. Sobnosky. "AIDS Activism and the Rejuvenation of the Public Sphere." Argumentation & Advocacy 31 (Spring 1995): 163-184.
Th: RRP pp. 343-362 (Bennett), pp. 422-446 (Brouwer)
Minnesota's vote no campaign:
Ringham, Eric, & Aslanian, Sasha. (2012, November 9). Eighteen months to history: How the Minnesota marriage amendment was defeated--money, passion, allies. MPRNews. Retrieved from http://minnesota.publicradio.org/display/web/2012/11/09/marriage-how
Lien, Andy. (2012, December 13). Organization of the year: An interview with Richard Carlbom, campaign manager of Minnesotans United for All Families. Lavender. Retrieved from http://www.lavendermagazine.com/our-affairs/interview-richard-carlbom/
The Big E. (2012, November 14). How Minnesotans defeated the anti-Marriage Amendment. Mn Progressive Project. Retrieved from http://mnprogressiveproject.com/how-minnesotans-defeated-the-anti-marriage-amendment/
||catalytic events, ego-function, identity, technical/public/personal spheres of argument, oscillation, perspective by incongruity, infrapolitics, hidden transcripts, visibility politics
|7: October 4, 6: Social Protest for Civil Rights and Against Racism
Tu: RRP: pp. 136-153 (Jackson), pp. 404-421 (Calafell & Delgado)
Th: RRSP: pp. 395-410 (Murphy); Foster, Susan Leigh. (2003, October). Choreographies of protest. Theatre Journal, 55(3), 395-412.
||identity, the function of the public sphere, concerns of the rhetorical study of counterpublicity, public vocabulary, hegemony, social control as symbolic action that renews the social order, naming, contextualization, diversion, legal sanction, moral confrontation, enclave, oscillating, counterpublic, parallel public,
|integrative marginalization, null persona, silence, materialism
|8: October 11, 13: Social Protest for Women's Rights and Against Sexism
Tu: RRSP: 172-183 (Campbell); Dow, Bonnie. "Feminism, Miss America, and Media Mythology." Rhetoric & Public Affairs 6.1 (2003): 127-149.
Th: RRP pp. 88-112 (Garlough); Demo, Anne Teresa. "'The Guerilla Girls' Comic Politics of Subversion'." Women's Studies in Communication 23.2 (Fall 2000): 133-. Academic OneFile. Gale. University of Northern Iowa. 30 Dec. 2008
||first/second/third wave feminism, enactment, decorum, empowerment, identity, perspective by incongruity, consciousness raising
|9: October 18, 20: Social Protest for Worker's Rights and Against Classism/Midterm
Tu: RRSP: pp. 335-353 (Tonn)
|October 20: Midterm
|10: October 25, 27: Social Protest for Native American Rights and Against Genocide
Tu: Lake, Randall. "Between Myth and History. " Quarterly Journal of Speech 77 (1991): 123-151. on EBSCO
Th: Miller, Jackson B. "'Indians,' 'Braves,' and 'Redskins': A Performative Struggle for Control of an Image." Quarterly Journal of Speech 85.2 (1999): 188-202 on EBSCO
October 25 Bring two (2) copies of a draft of paper two to class. You will trade papers with two others. Edited papers should be returned to their authors on October 27.
|enactment, consummatory/instrumental, charisma, identity
|11: November 1, 3: Social Protest Using New Communication Technologies
Tu: Garrett, R. Kelley. "Protest in an Information Society." Information, Communication & Society 9.2 (2006): 202-224. on eLearning
Th: Lane, Jill. "Digital Zapatistas." The Drama Review 47.2 (Summer 2003): 129-144.
|November 1: Paper 2 due
||globalization, counterpublicity, the elements of a counterpublic, cyber-movements, hacktivism, the functions of counterpublics, NGOs as protest organizations, weak v. strong publics
|12: November 8, 10: Performing Social Protest
Tu: Park-Fuller, Linda M. "Audiencing the Audience: Playback Theatre, Performative Writing, and Social Activism." Text & Performance Quarterly 23.3 (July 2003): 288-310. also on eLearning
Th: Bruner, M. Lane. "Carnivalesque Protest and the Humorless State." Text & Performance Quarterly 25.2 (April 2005): 136-155.
Lane, Jill. (2002, Spring). Reverend Billy: Preaching, protest, and postindustrial flanerie.
TDR: The Drama Review, 46(1) , pp. 60-84
|irony, performance, carnivalesque, boundary crossing, celebratory performative protest, interventionist performative protest, cultural/representational, social/institutional
|13: November 15, 17 (NCA)
|November 15 and 17: in class peer editing -- bring two (2) copies of the draft of your final paper to class
|14: November 22, 24: Thanksgiving Break
|15: November 29, December 1: The Ethics of Social Protest: "[P]rotest is primarily about exercising moral voice . . ." (Jasper 253).
Tu: Terry, David P. "Once Blind, Now Seeing." Text and Performance Quarterly 26.3 (2006): 209-228. on eLearning
Th: Garrick, David A. "Performances of Self-Disclosure: A Personal History." The Drama Review 45.4 (Winter 2001): 94-105.
||risks of protest, identity, abstract systems, totalizing visions' dangers, embedded systems, public sphere, tactics are never neutral means
|16: December 6, 8: Presentations
|Deember 6: Paper 3 due
|17: December: Final exam period:
1-2:50 p.m. Wednesday, December 14
Supplemental readings: These readings are not assigned, but may be helpful with your individual projects.
WEEK 1 :Supplemental readings:
Griffin, Leland M. "A Dramatistic Theory of the Rhetoric of Movements." Critical Responses to Kenneth Burke. Ed. William H. Reuckert. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 1969. 456-478.
RRSP: 115-125 (McGee), 374-94 (Zarefsky)
WEEK 2 :Supplemental readings:
Dow, Bonnie J. "AIDS, Perspective by Incongruity, and Gay Identity in Larry Kramer's '1,112 and Counting'." Communication Studies 45 (Fall-Winter 1994): 225-240.
Stewart, Charles J. "Championing the Rights of Others and Challenging Evil: The Ego Function in the Rhetoric of Other-directed Social Movements." Southern Communication Journal 64 (Winter 1999): 91-105.
RRSP: 95-104 (Cathcart)
WEEK 3 : Supplemental readings:
Habermas, Jürgen. "The Public Sphere." Jürgen Habermas on Society and Politics: A Reader. Ed. Steven Seidman. Boston: Beacon Press, 1989. 231-236.
Habermas, Jürgen. "Further Reflections on the Public Sphere." Habermas and the Public Sphere. Ed. Craig Calhoun. Cambridge: MIT Press, 1992. 421-461.
Asen, Robert. "Seeking the 'Counter' in Counterpublics." Communication Theory 10 (2000): 424-446.
Summary of Fraser article.
Fraser, Nancy. Transnationalizing the Public Sphere.
WEEK 4 : Supplemental readings:
Lake, Randall A. and Barbara A. Pickering. "Argumentation, the Visual, and the Possibility of Refutation: An Exploration." Argumentation 12 (February 1998): 79 - 93. Accessible with SpringerLink.
Palczewski, Catherine Helen. "The Male Madonna and the Feminine Uncle Sam: Visual Argument, Icons, and Ideographs in 1909 Anti-Woman Suffrage Postcards." Quarterly Journal of Speech 91.4 (November 2005): 365-294. Accessible with Ingenta
WEEK 5 : Supplemental readings:
Short, Brant. "Earth First!" Communication Studies 42 (Summer 1991): 172-188.
DeLuca, Kevin Michael. Image Politics: The New Rhetoric of Environmental Activism. New York: Guilford Press, 1999.
WEEK 6: Supplemental readings:
Karma, Chávez. "Beyond Complicity: Coherence, Queer Theory, and the Rhetoric of the 'Gay Christian Movement.'" Text and Performance Quarterly 24 (October 2004): 255-275.
Brouwer, Daniel. "Corps/Corpse: the U.S. Military and Homosexuality." Western Journal of Communication 68 (Fall 2004): 411-431.
Slagle, R. Anthony. "In Defense of Queer Nation: From Identity Politics to a Politics of Difference." Western Journal of Communication 59 (Spring 1995): 85-102.
Christiansen, Adrienne E. and Jeremy J. Hanson. "Comedy as Cure for Tragedy: ACT UP and the Rhetoric of AIDS." Quarterly Journal of Speech 82 (May 1996): 157-170.
Nip, Joyce Y. M. "The Queer Sisters and its Electronic Bulletin Board: A Study of the Internet for Social Movement Mobilization." Information Communication & Society 7 (March 2004): 23-49.
Brouwer, Daniel C. "Counterpublicity and Corporeality in HIV/AIDS Zines." Critical Studies in Media Communication 22.5 (December 2005): 351-371. Available via Informaworld
WEEK 7 : Supplemental readings:
RRSP: Hammerback & Jensen, pp. 304-319
Griffin, Leland M. "When Dreams Collide." Quarterly Journal of Speech 70 (1984): 111-131.
Dionisopoulos, George N. et al. "Martin Luther King." Western Journal of Communication 56 (Spring 1992): 91-107.
Delgado, Fernando Pedro. "Chicano Movement Rhetoric: An Ideographic Interpretation." Communication Quarterly 43 (Fall 1995): 446-454.
Flores, Lisa A. "Creating Discursive Space Through a Rhetoric of Difference: Chicana Feminists Craft a Homeland." Quarterly Journal of Speech 82 (May 1996): 142-156.
Benson, Thomas W. "Rhetoric and Autobiography: The Case of Malcolm X." Quarterly Journal of Speech 60.1 (February 1974): 1-13.
James, Lawrence B. "The Influence of Black Orality on Contemporary Black Poetry and its Implications for Performance." Southern Speech Communication Journal 45 (Spring 1980): 249-267.
Madison, D. Soyini. "'That Was My Occupation': Oral Narrative, Performance, and Black Feminist Thought." Text and Performance Quarterly 13 (July 1993): 213-232.
WEEK 8: Supplemental readings:
Mechling, Elizabeth Walker and Jay Mechling. "The Jung and the Restless: The Mythopoetic Men's Movement." The Southern Communication Journal 59 (Winter 1994): 97-111.
Fabj, Valeria. "Motherhood as Political Voice: The Rhetoric of the Mothers of Plaza de Mayo." Communication Studies 44 (Spring 1993): 1-18.
see also: "Argentina Mothers of Plaza de Mayo: Living legacy of hope and human rights" link
Capo, Kay Ellen and Darlene M. Hantzis. "(En)Gendered (and Engendering) Subjects: Writing, Reading, Performing, and Theorizing Feminist Criticism." Text and Performance Quarterly 11 (1991): 249-266.
Vanderford, Marsha L. "Vilification and Social Movements." Quarterly Journal of Speech 75 (1989): 166-182.
Miller, Lynn C. "'Polymorphous Perversity' in Women's Performance Art: The Case of Holly Hughes." Text and Performance Quarterly 15 (1995): 44-58.
Stacey K. Sowards and Valerie R. Renegar. "The Rhetorical Functions of Consciousness-Raising in Third Wave Feminism." Communication Studies 55 (Winter 2004): 535-52.
WEEK 9 : Supplemental readings: (link)
WEEK 10: supplemental readings:
Morris, Richard and Philip Wander. "Native American Rhetoric." Quarterly Journal of Speech76 (1990): 164-191.
Lake, Randall A. "Between Myth and History." Quarterly Journal of Speech 77 (1991): 125-151.
Palczewski, Catherine H. "When Times Collide: Ward Churchill's Use of an Epideictic Moment to Ground Forensic Argument." Argumentation & Advocacy 41 (2005): 123-138.
WEEK 11 : Supplemental readings:
Owens, Lynn, and L. Kendall Palmer. "Making the News: Anarchist Counter-public Relations on the World Wide Web." Critical Studies in Media Communication 20 (December 2003): 335-361.
Van Aelst, Peter, and StefaanWalgrave. "New Media, New Movements?" Information Communication & Society 5.4 (2002): 465-493.
WEEK 12 :Supplemental readings:
Chvasta, Marcyrose. "Anger, Irony, and Protest: Confronting the Issue of Efficacy, Again." Text & Performance Quarterly 26.1 (January 2006): 5-16.
WEEK 15 :Supplemental readings:
Terry, David P. "Once Blind, Now Seeing: Problematics of Confessional Performance." Text & Performance Quarterly 26.3 (July 2006): 209-228.
Fenske, Mindy. "The Aesthetic of the Unfinished: Ethics and Performance." Text and Performance Quarterly 24 (January 2004): 1-19.