Summary of January 17, 2001

Meeting of Assessment Coordinators

St. Louis Airport Holiday Inn

Assessment Coordinators or Persons

Representing Assessment Coordinators Present at the Meeting:

Jean Behrends – California State University, Fresno

Rob Boody – University of Northern Iowa

Jerry Long – Emporia State University

Georgea Langer – Eastern Michigan University

Ben Berhow – Millersville University

Betty Jo Simmons – Longwood University

Nancy Keese – Middle Tennessee State University

Tony Norman – Western Kentucky University

Jo Anne Rainey – Kentucky State University

Beverly Petch-Hogan – Southeast Missouri State

Members of the Assessment Coordinators group shared their experiences with the August 2000 draft of the Renaissance Teacher Work Sample Prompt.  University of Northern Iowa and Western Kentucky University had modified the prompt to be more user friendly for teacher candidates.  Emporia State University had not only made substantial modifications in the prompt but also had spent considerable time developing a scoring rubric to assess performance levels of student teachers at the end of the fall semester of 2000.  Jerry Long from Emporia State University shared their model and scoring rubrics with other participants.

Since the original plan for group consensus about a scoring rubric and revision of the prompt across project sites had not been possible, institution representatives met in the afternoon of January 17 to identify the teaching processes that should be assessed and how the teaching processes should be defined in the prompt and in the scoring rubric.  Seven processes were identified and working groups were formed to begin to flesh out the indicators for each teaching process.  The seven processes were:

Because Emporia State University had spent considerable time developing the model they used in the fall of 2000 with faculty and school practitioners, the Emporia State University group elected to continue to use their model with programs in their partner schools in Kansas.  Representatives from the other nine project sites agreed to come back together on Thursday, Friday and Saturday to flesh out processes, standards and indicators to develop a revised and more user-friendly prompt and scoring rubrics that would be used in the spring semester of 2001.