|
Quotations from Educating Americans for the 21st Century Educating Americans for the 21st Century: A plan of action for improving mathematics, science and technology education for all American elementary and secondary students so that their achievement is the best in the world by 1995. The National Science Board Commission on Precollege Education in Mathematics, Science and Technology, 1983. | ||
|---|---|---|
| Scientific and Technological Literacy | More Time for Science and Technology Studies | Proposed Curriculum Guidelines |
| Special Courses at Early High School Level | Technology-Oriented Testing | Two-Year Course Sequence, Grades 9-10 |
| Fundamentals in Precollege Technology Education | General Recommendations, Grades K through Elementary Years | Technological Literacy |
| Rationale for Learning Technology at the Precollege Level | Recommendations | |
Science should be taught daily in most of these grades [K-6]. This implies about twice as much time devoted to science than at present. [30]
. . . in grades 9-11 it is recommended that the curriculum be structured around the interaction of science and technology with the whole society. [30]
Middle School Years. It is in the middle school/junior high school years that much can be done to ensure technological literacy of young persons. We should use technology as a way of introducing the individual disciplines of mathematics and science, and stimulating greater student interest in these disciplines.
Career information for students in most fields -- including science, mathematics, and engineering -- is inadequate now. Career information should be introduced as early as elementary school, and should be expanded upon in middle school. This would enable students to choose their courses in high school more intelligently, and help them decide their appropriate plans . . . .
It is recommended that a course in technology and technological thought be developed for use either at the eighth or ninth grade level. This is an appropriate time to cover subjects in technology indepth, rather than waiting until the last year of high school.
Conclusion. One result of this workshop was the strong recommendation that a foundation in technology be regarded as fundamental as reading and writing for all -- not just the high-achiever for whom excellent curricular materials have already been developed. It was felt that every student deserves to be aware of the impact of technological advance and able to understand the underlying technology itself. An understanding of technology has rarely been thought of as important for every high school graduate in order to ensure their literacy in this culture. Now society must ensure that an understanding of technology be a part of each student's basic education. [71]
It is widely agreed that technology is not dealt with effectively now. There are few teachers knowledgeable in this field. Consequently, many teachers are often timid about technical subjects and do not readily incorporate them into their lessons. Moreover, there is no real provision made for including technology in existing courses, and whatever students receive is too little, too late. [72]
The use of the term "precollege" in all discussions of K-12 education tends to imply concern for college-bound students exclusively, yet we are concerned about the technology education of all students. Public understanding of technology must be greatly improved, and the most fundamental way of accomplishing this is to work at it through the schools. [72-73]
Technological literacy needs to be a part of general literacy and "numeracy." In a sense we are speaking of "basics" in education, and we are identifying the knowledge and understanding of technology as basic. Technological literacy is different from scientific literacy. An understanding of scientific and mathematical concepts doesn't automatically result in an understanding of technology.
. . . It is difficult to introduce the concept of project work and design of physical things into an academic environment. What is principally lacking is faculty experience in technology; thus, we must better prepare our teachers. The education of teachers in technology must be, in part, experiential, so that they can educate students in an experiential way.
People must understand the limitations as well as the capabilities of emerging technologies. The technologically literate person should have a sense of what technology can and cannot do. He or she should not believe that technology can solve all ills, nor that technology is responsible for most problems.
Contributing to technological literacy is an understanding of: (1) the historical role of technology in human development, (2) the relationship between technological decisions and human values, (3) the benefits and risks of choosing among technologies, (4) the changes occurring in current technology, and (5) an understanding of technology assessment as a method of influencing the choice of future technologies. [74]
Because technology affects all facets of society, ideas related to technology should be introduced in all appropriate subject areas. There is a need for technological concepts to pervade the entire precollege curriculum.
During these years there needs to be considerable attention given to developing the mathematical skills of students. They should gain a strong grounding in arithmetic as a foundation for future use of mathematics as a tool. Reading can be a method of incorporating science and technology into a young person's school day. There should be opportunities in reading lessons to learn about individuals in science and technology as well as simple content material. Science can best be introduced as "applied science,"which is technology [writer disagrees here]
This is an appropriate time to cover subjects in technology in more detail, rather than waiting until the last year of high school. Hence, we recommend that eighth or ninth grade be used to offer an introduction to technology course. This should not follow the same pattern as the Man Made World curriculum, which was for older students. Rather it should be designed to be useful to all students about to begin their high school sequence.
Career education makes more sense if it is related to things that students are currently learning in class. Information can be included along with subject matter in the entire curriculum offered.
Students must neither be given unrealistic expectations nor tracked into a career path too early so that other options either become difficult for them or are denied. By providing career information early, however, we can ensure that students realize the education and training that is required for certain career paths. The emphasis should be on the flexibility of career choice that comes with a strong background in mathematics, science, and technology.
The study of technological systems should be used as a basis for providing integrated and holistic learning. This is our reason for suggesting that all academic departments be involved. We cannot afford to repeat the mistakes of the past. If we are to embark on this revitalization of the secondary school and the middle school experience, it must be a task that intimately involves the students, the faculty, and staff of these institutions. Too much of our curriculum development and materials preparation has been done exclusively by individuals in higher education who have little knowledge of how high schools and middle schools work. There must be a stronger working relationship between these two groups to eradicate this unfortunate disassociation of the curriculum from the reality of the schools. High school people must be involved not just as end users, but also in the initial stages of planning and organizing the curriculum in technology.
The engineering community needs to work closely with leaders in science, mathematics, English, industrial arts and social studies curriculum development to convey the importance of technological content for their work. The engineering profession must also be called upon to assist in "marketing" technology study to schools and students. It is not just going to happen if the schools are told to incorporate technology education. Technology is foreign to the schools and, as a result, they need outside help, which can and should come from the profession.
The need to integrate technology into the precollege curriculum gives us an additional reason to foster partnerships among business, industry, and education. Collaborative efforts are the only reasonable approach to complex problems of this sort.
True learning includes first, a sense of accomplishment and satisfaction, second, an excitement which generates further exploration, and third, a desire to relate this new ability to other areas. It is our position that the study of technology can stimulate this cycle and foster true learning in science and mathematics as well. Beyond all practical reasons, we encourage the study of technology by young people strictly for the simple joy of it and for the great satisfaction that comes with an understanding of how the world works. Top