A: Let's consider for example a corn plant that might have been made
resistant to an insect. We would be looking to make sure that the new
gene we had put into that plant was stable, it was the same gene that
we put in there, it hadn't been rearranged, that it was still working the
way we intended it too. So we would take samples from lots of different
plant tissues and plants grown in different environments, and measure
the amount of protein being produced just to assure ourselves that the
product really was behaving as we expected it to. We'd then look at the
safety of the protein itself and that would involve maybe a lot of
biochemistry to produce enough protein so we could actually feed that
to animals, usually we choose mice for example and feed them a huge
excess of what any human might be exposed to when they ate that
product. We would also assess the potential of the protein to be a
toxin, again that should show up very quickly in a test on mice if this
protein has any toxic effects. We also evaluate it to find out whether or
not it has any potential to be a food allergen. Of course we're very
concerned with avoiding anything that might be allergenic so that
people don't develop new allergies or we don't cause people who are
already allergic to something to become ill. We also have to look very
closely at the properties of the crop itself. So we look at the
composition of the crop very carefully we measure a large number of
parameters; the protein composition, the amino acid composition, the
oil profile, the carbohydrate profile, any natural toxicants that may be
in the products. After all many of our food crops contain a lot of natural
toxins and it's important to make sure that we haven't changed the
composition of those natural toxins during the genetic engineering
process. And of course we also want to know that these products are
safe for people to eat and animals to feed on but also that they're not
going to have adverse interactions with the environment. So we would
test the crop or the protein against some representative species
particularly insects that are beneficial in fields, things like ladybugs that
eat aphids. We would test the proteins against ladybugs and make
sure they're not adversely affected. We might also feed the crop to
birds for example to make sure they don't have any adverse effect on
wildlife. So it's a series of these environmental tests. Looking also at
for instance how quickly does it break down in the soil because we don't
want to put some materials into the soil that are going to stay there for
a long period of time. We're also concerned that it wouldn't affect
things like earthworms which are important in maintaining soil quality.
So again we look at a whole spectrum of these soil invertebrates, make
sure they're not adversely affected. Once we've gone through all these
different tests aimed at food safety, feed safety, and environmental
safety, then we can go to the federal agencies, the FDA, the USDA, the
EPA, and ask them for approvals to put out products on the market and
that process can take several years.
Q: What are the specific jurisdictions of the various regulatory
agencies?
A: It's a coordinated framework of regulations and the USDA looks
particularly at the agricultural properties of the crop, for instance does
this new plant that you've produced have any potential to become a
weed that might be invasive of agricultural environments? Or could the
gene outcross for instance through pollination/cross-pollination to a wild
relative for instance and then become part of the natural flora which is
something one would not want to see if that was going to have some
sort of negative impact on the natural flora. So USDA's very much
concerned about the nature of the plant and the interactions in the
environment. The EPA is also concerned about the environmental
impact of these products, but is much more concerned for instance
about their impact on non-targets as they call them, in other words
things that you don't want to kill. So if you're after killing corn-borers
that there's a whole lot of other things that you don't want to kill,
monarch butterflies for example. So the EPA focuses very much on the
environmental impact on these non-targets. The FDA focuses mostly
obviously on food and feed safety, they have responsibility for both
things, not only for human food safety but they also have to evaluate
these products to make sure they're safe for animal feed which is where
most of them are going. So between the three agencies they have a
fairly effective network that covers the environmental, the food and the
feed safety.
Transcript for Clip 2 -- Labeling:
Well we would like to make sure the public has as much information on
the food they're eating as possible. However I don't think it's always
going to be possible to convey that information through labeling on a
product. [Just] think about the way that we handle the corn crop in this
country--where basically everything is harvested all at one time. It's
stored in huge quantities in vast elevators and shipped around the
country in large rail cars or in boats that hold hundreds of thousands of
tons of grain. We really don't have a system that supports the sort of
segregation that would allow you to have a stream of product that's GM
and a stream that's non-GM, so that would make labeling very difficult. More comments from Rod Townsend...
Q: What are you looking for in the testing process?
Top
Posted March 6, 2001