We invite all UNI College of Education Secretaries to join us in this electronic forum. The audience for this group will only be COE Secretaries who share their professional concerns, interests and mission. The electronic mailing list is private to this group. The purpose of this group is to facilitate professional communication among COE Secretaries. It is an un-moderated discussion group.

Send comments to nancy.wegand@uni.edu.

•FAQs

How do I sub or unsub to COESEC-L?
To communicate administratively about the list send mail to:

~ This is KEY ~

You MUST send your sub or unsub commands to mailserv@uni.edu !
DO NOT SEND THESE REQUESTS to the list (coesec-l@uni.edu) !
THUS . . .
SEND your message to: MAILSERV@UNI.EDU

To sign-off send this message:
UNSUBSCRIBE COESEC-L

To sign-up send this message:
SUBSCRIBE COESEC-L

To post message to recipients of the COESEC-L send to:
COESEC-L@UNI.EDU

What do I do if I change my email address and want to stay on
COESEC-L?
If you leave one email address in favor of another, unsub the old while you still have rights to it. You cannot unsub the old address from your new address. Once the old address is invalid bounces will begin to show up in the list owner’s mailbox. If you forget to unsub old address send an email to nancy.wegand@uni.edu requesting that she unsub your old address. Include the old address in this request. Using the *reply* command to a message read on COESEC-L will send your reply to the person who wrote the message.

What should I do if I begin to receive the same email message repeatedly?
If you find that you are receiving the same COESEC-L message over and over, do **NOT** post a message back to the COESEC-L list asking if others are seeing the same thing. They are, and they will also begin to see your query over and over. Mailboxes will simply fill up twice as fast. Instead, forward *one* copy of the message to nancy.wegand@uni.edu and to ken.connelly@uni.edu. The copy that you choose to forward should include all of the e-mail header information and should *not* be the first copy that you received (the first copy will not include tracks of the offending system in the headers).

(Updated July 7, 2003)