Office of Academic Assessment

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

CRITERIA FOR REVIEW OF MINI-GRANT PROPOSALS

 

For a pdf copy of the proposal review document, click here. For a copy of this document in Word, click here.

 

Criteria

 

     

Relationship of project to specific assessment plans/needs of the academic department/LAC category.

 

 

 

 

Potential to support development with respect to student learning, program quality, and/or department/program assessment planning

 

 

 

 

Clarity of purpose and intended outcomes

 

 

 

 

Feasibility and specificity of the plan of action and related timelines

 

 

 

 

Adequacy and defensibility of the budget related to project goals

 

 

 

 

Articulation of a clearly defined strategy for disseminating and using project outcomes

 

 

 

 

Rating Categories for Criteria:

 

Excellent:

Well-developed plan, clearly and thoughtfully presented, capable of immediate and successful implementation.

 

Satisfactory:

Details and justifications/explanations are sufficient to show direction and potential for productive action, capable of being implemented with a minimum of fine-tuning or additional planning.

 

Needs Work:

Missing some information, justifications/explanations not clearly presented or inadequate, implementation would require further clarification or development before action could be taken.

 

[Return to Assessment Mini-Grant Program homepage]

Diversity Logo